Indirect discrimination case: requirements under Equality Act 2010 s.19(2) - Essop v Home Office (UK Border Agency) [CA] 22.06.15 (Unreported)


Tue, 23 Jun 2015

In order to succeed in a claim for indirect discrimination, it was necessary for a claimant to show not only that he was a member of a disadvantaged group for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010 s.19(2)(b), but why the relevant practice, criterion or procedure had disadvantaged him as an individual under s.19(2)(c).




Category: Employment »  Age discrimination; Race discrimination. Area(s) of law: Employment.
Source: [2015] EWCA Civ 609

 

This material is for information purposes only and does not constitute any form of advice or recommendation by us. You should not rely upon it in making any decisions or taking or refraining from taking any action. Please contact Brodies at mailbox@brodies.com if you would like us to advise you on any of the matters covered in this material.


Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional  Valid CSS!

Free SSL Certificate