Advocate General’s Opinion in “Woolworths” collective redundancy case - Union of Shop, Distributive and Allied Workers (USDAW), v WW Realisation 1 Ltd (In Liquidation) (C-80/14); Canas v Nexea Gestion Documental S.A. (C-392/13); Lyttle v Bluebird UK Bidco 2 Ltd (C-182/13) [ECJ AdvGen] 05.02.15 (Unreported)


Fri, 06 Feb 2015

Employment law – Collective redundancies - Directive 98/59/EC article 1 —Concept of ‘establishment’ — Method of calculating the number of dismissals – Whether collective redundancies had taken place. HELD that the EU Collective Redundancies Directive 98/59 did not require that the numbers of employees dismissed across an employer’s various establishments be aggregated to see if the thresholds for protection under the Directive are met. "Establishment" meant a local employment unit for collective redundancy purposes




Category: Employment »  Redundancy. Area(s) of law: Employment.
Source: Unspecified

 

This material is for information purposes only and does not constitute any form of advice or recommendation by us. You should not rely upon it in making any decisions or taking or refraining from taking any action. Please contact Brodies at mailbox@brodies.com if you would like us to advise you on any of the matters covered in this material.


Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional  Valid CSS!

Free SSL Certificate