Failure by ET to consider substance of claim before it - Saha v Capita Plc [EAT] 29.11.18 (Unreported)


Wed, 05 Dec 2018

An employment tribunal's duty was to hear the case before it. A tribunal should not have stuck slavishly to a list of issues where one of the claimant's claims had been miscategorised as a claim under the Employment Rights Act 1996 s.45A(1), rather than a protected disclosure under s.43B(1)(b) that an employer was failing with comply with its legal obligations under the Working Time Regulations 1998.




Category: Employment »  Tribunal procedure; Working time; Whistleblowing. Area(s) of law: Employment.
Source: Unspecified

 

This material is for information purposes only and does not constitute any form of advice or recommendation by us. You should not rely upon it in making any decisions or taking or refraining from taking any action. Please contact Brodies at mailbox@brodies.com if you would like us to advise you on any of the matters covered in this material.


Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional  Valid CSS!

Free SSL Certificate