EAT decision re comparators in equal pay claims - Reading BC v James [EAT] 07.06.18 (Unreported)


Tue, 12 Jun 2018

Where male comparators in equal pay claims had been promoted, or left their roles, part way through the period for which the claimants sought equal pay, that could not defeat the claims. The claimants were not required to find another comparator for the balance of the period, as they already had a statutorily implied contractual right to higher pay by the time the comparators' roles changed.




Category: Employment »  Equal pay. Area(s) of law: Employment.
Source: [2018] UKEAT 0222_17_0706

 

This material is for information purposes only and does not constitute any form of advice or recommendation by us. You should not rely upon it in making any decisions or taking or refraining from taking any action. Please contact Brodies at mailbox@brodies.com if you would like us to advise you on any of the matters covered in this material.


Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional  Valid CSS!

Free SSL Certificate